Evolution Korea
In the debate over evolution, Korean scientists aren't taking their chances. The Society for Textbook Revise (STR) has been fighting to have Archaeopteryx and horses taken out of textbooks, saying they are typical icons of evolutionism.
Confucian practices, with their focus on achieving success in the world and high value of learning still dominates the culture of the country. However, Korea is in search of an alternative development model.
Origins
The growth of Iron Age cultures brought more sophisticated states to the Korean Peninsula, like Goguryeo and Baekje. Each of them had their own distinct cultural style that was influenced from their powerful neighbours. They also adopted aspects of Chinese culture such as Confucianism, Buddhism and shamanism.
Goguryeo was the first of these kingdoms to impose its own form of government on the Korean people. It consolidated its power in the 1st century and established a king-centered rule system by the beginning of the 2nd century. Through a series of wars, it eliminated the factions loyal to the Han dynasty from the north of the peninsula. It expanded its territory into Manchuria too.
It was during this time that a regional confederation emerged named Buyeo. Its founder Wang Geon was given the title of king, and his name was recorded down in the 13th-century Samguk yusa (Memorabilia of the Three Kingdoms). Buyeo was later referred to as Goryeo and this is the reason why the name Korea came to be. Goryeo was a prosperous commercial and economic system and was also a center for learning. They raised goats, sheep and other animals and created furs from them. They wrote poetry and masked dance-dramas like sandaenori and tallori and held a festival every year called Yeonggo in December.
Goryeo’s economy was boosted through the brisk trade, which included the Song Dynasty in China. Traders from Central Asia, Arabia, Southeast Asia and Japan came to Byeongnando which was the entrance to Gaeseong, the capital city. Gaeseong. Silk and medicinal herbs were among the goods they brought.
Around 8,000 BCE Around 8,000 BCE, the Koreans began to establish permanent settlements and started cultivating cereal crops. They also developed pottery and polished stone tools, and started organising themselves into clan societies. The Neolithic Age lasted until the 12th century BC. At this time Gija was a prince of the Shang dynasty of China, purportedly brought a new high culture to Korea. In the 20th century, many Koreans believed that Dangun and Gija gave Korea its people and their traditional culture, respectively.
Functions
Korea's previous model of development, focusing on state-led capital accumulation and government intervention in industries and business as well as an explosive growth in its economy, catapulting it from being one of the poorest nations in the world to the ranks of OECD nations in a mere three years. The system was plagued by moral hazard and corruption that was outright. www.evolutionkr.kr was therefore not sustainable in an economy characterized by liberalization, trade, and the process of democratization.
The current crisis has exposed the weaknesses of the previous paradigm, and it's likely that an alternative model will be developed in its place. Chapters 3 and 4 look at the roots of Korea's government-business risk partnership and explain how the emergence of business actors with an interest in preserving this system prevented the country from implementing fundamental changes. By focusing on corporate governance and the allocation of financial resources These chapters provide a thorough analysis of the causes of the crisis and point to ways of moving forward through reforms.
Chapter 5 examines the possible paths that Korea's evolving development paradigm during the post-crisis time frame, examining both the legacy of the past as well as new trends generated by the IT revolution and globalization. It also examines how these trends will impact Korea's political and social structures.
The most important finding is that there are many emerging trends that are changing the nature of power and will affect the future of the country. Despite the fact that participation in politics in Korea is still very restricted New forms of power are emerging which override political parties and challenge them, changing the system of democracy in Korea.
Another important finding is that the power of the Korean elite isn't as strong as it once was, and that a significant portion of society is feeling of being disconnected from the ruling class. This indicates the need for more civic education and participation as well as new ways of power-sharing. Ultimately, the chapter concludes that the success or failure of Korea's new development paradigm will depend on how well these new developments can be combined with a willingness to make hard decisions.
Benefits
South Korea is the world's ninth largest economy and the sixth fastest growing. It has an expanding middle class and an extensive R&D infrastructure which drives innovation. The government has also recently increased its investment in infrastructure projects, to help boost economic growth as well as promote social equity.
In 2008 the Lee Myung-bak administration released five indicators of leadership in an attempt to establish a new system of development with a focus on change and practicality. It made efforts to streamline government organization and privatize public companies for more efficiency, and also reform administrative regulations.
Since the conclusion of the Cold War, South Korea is pursuing a strategy for integration of its economy with the rest and beyond the region. Exports of high-tech consumer electronics as well as advanced manufacturing technologies have become a major source of income. In addition the government has been pushing the Saemaeul Undong (New Community Movement) initiative, which has transformed the country from an agricultural society into one that is focused on manufacturing.
The country also has an extremely high standard of living and offers a range of benefits to employees, including the right to maternity leave and job security. Employers are also required to subscribe to accident insurance, which provides the cost of work-related illnesses and injuries. In addition, it is common for companies to offer private medical insurance that provides protection for illnesses that are not covered by National Health Insurance.
As a result, South Korea has been thought of as a model for success for many of the developing nations around the globe. However, the global financial crisis that struck Asia in 1997 challenged this notion. The crisis challenged the notion about Asia's miracle economies and caused a fundamental rethinking of the role of the state in regulating the risky private sector economic activities.
It appears that Korea's future is still uncertain in the wake of these changes. A new generation of leaders have adopted the image as a "strong leader" and begun to explore market-oriented policies. On the other hand, a strong domestic power base has made it difficult to implement radical changes.
Disadvantages
The revival and influence of creationists is a major hurdle for Korean science in its efforts to inform the public about evolution. The majority of Koreans support teaching students about evolution, but a small group headed by Bun-Sam Lim (the head of the Society for Textbook Revise, STR) is advocating for the removal of it from textbooks. STR claims that teaching evolution encourages an "materialist atheism" and presents an "unhopeful worldview" for students. This can cause them to lose their faith in humanity.
The reasons behind anti-evolutionary sentiments are complex and diverse. Some researchers suggest that it is due to religious belief, while others point to an increasing prevalence of anti-intellectualism, which has been exacerbated by growing political elite fragmentation along ideologies, regions, class, and gender. Additionally the one-sided populism of the federal government, aided by powerful conservative business interests and think tanks and business interests, has led to a growing distrust of the scientific community.
In the final analysis the study's findings about numerous vulnerabilities point to the need for targeted policies that can mitigate them preemptively. These insights will help Seoul to achieve its goal of becoming a cityscape that is harmonious.
In the COVID-19 case, pinpointing the vulnerable neighborhoods and their occupants will be crucial to drafting detailed, compassionate policy measures to improve their lives and safety. The disproportionate impact of COVID-19 on Jjokbangs, for example is a reflection of the socio-economic differences that can compound vulnerability to both natural and man-made disasters.
To overcome this, South Korea requires a more inclusive and diverse civil society that brings together all communities to solve the most pressing issues of the city. This requires a fundamental shift in the structure and power of the institution of politics. At present, the Blue House is able to mobilize a vast bureaucracy and politically leverage the Supreme Prosecutor's Office and intelligence bureau, which all are not subject to oversight by parliamentary bodies or independent inspection agencies. This gives the president enormous power to force his or her views on the rest of the nation. This can lead to partisanship that could lead to stagnation and polarization throughout the country.